| Posts by LinkZelda | |
| > >> | |
LinkZelda (919)
I didn't do this but here's what happened:
In [color=black][b]EPIC[/color][/b] [color=red][b]INJURIES!!![/color][/b] 20 Apr 2013 08:06 * He was playing golf indoors * The club hit a chandelier above causing it to fall * It hit his hand causing his tendon to be cut It was so funny. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
Right handed; right wing.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished Quesadilla spake:Could they actually banish a phone after millions of people purchased it already? I'm quite concerned since I have the phone.The court should find Samsung "not liable" since these aren't big enough issues. If they don't they can't ban people from using phones. This is only civil law. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished Lilwayne1556 spake:If they were suing for the features Android has they can't sue Samsung about that since they didn't make Android.They can. They would be more likely to succeed since they'd use their previous case as a precedent. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
It stops Android from using features; the court is allowed to grant injunctions to stop these features.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished Moulder spake:That news script said nothing about an existing way to warp drive.No but theoretically it is possible. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished Moulder spake:Personally, I don't see why Apple wants to sue them. Doesn't Apple have enough money already?It gives them a bigger market share since they could use the legal precedent to sue other companies. Personally, I think this would give Apple an unfair advantage unless it was a major issue e.g. stealing their logo. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
There's always a dictator.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
Takes note.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished StrangeEnigma spake:Can someone shut this down. It's obvious nobody is going to agree here, so what the hell is the point of continuing this discussion?It's not a discussion. Nobody can win without solid evidence for or against God's existence. Both sides are ideas. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
I don't believe there isn't one either.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
I'm not atheistic. I'm a skeptic.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished Sniped Hearts spake:This thread is a waste of data. No one on here knows about love considering Paint consists of 95% of people that are kids. The question should really be: Are you infatuated or are you just stupid?They say it as soon as they start 'dating' it's so funny. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished Mattpoppybros spake:Linkzelda, there are more than two sides here, and atheism isn't a religion.Those points are true under my argument. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
You're fired just because I can.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
The distinguished Windowlicker spake:Fake pictures are actually safer for you online than real ones. Au contraire, real pics are a sign of confidence. Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
Nah love is too strong.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
I don't believe in either sides of the argument. Religion should be purely philosophical since it is.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
I will never voluntarily post something stupid unless I am intoxicated.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
|
PHP bro.
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
|
|
| > >> | |
